The First Word: Luke
23:34
Ecumenical Good Friday
Service
March 25, 2005
The Word of
Forgiveness
“Then Jesus said,
‘Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.’”
What did Jesus
mean? And what did Jesus not mean?
Jesus did not mean, “Father, the vicious, cruel
things these people are doing are O.K.,” because they weren’t.
Jesus did not mean, “Father, may you erase these
deeds from your omnipotent memory,” because God the Father won’t.
Jesus did not mean, “There are no consequences
from these vicious deeds,” because he was all-too painfully and personally
aware of them. He was being crucified
as a result of the deeds of the Roman soldiers and the intentions of his
opponents of all sorts.
Jesus did mean, “Father, don’t wipe these
people off the face of the earth, as you could so easily do. Don’t avenge
me. Instead, Father, give these people,
all these people, even these people, another chance. Don’t take
vengeance. Instead, Father, stay open
to having a saving relationship with these people, these people for whom I came to earth and for whom I am
dying. Besides, they really don’t
know what they are doing.”
Forgiveness
doesn’t mean “it’s O.K.,” because it isn’t.
If it was, forgiveness wouldn’t be needed.
Forgiveness doesn’t
mean “Forget it,” because actually, you might not, and neither might the
perpetrator.
Forgiveness does
not mean, “There are no consequences for the wrong action,” because there
are. In some cases, there are judicial
consequences. In fact, a person can
both “press charges” and consider
forgiving the perpetrator spiritually.
Pressing charges
could result in a dangerous person going to jail and not endangering other
people (or oneself again). Pressing
charges can be done to protect others as well as to seek to ensure that a
person loses some freedom or money as just punishment for what the perpetrator
has done.
Forgiveness,
however, does mean that “I give up my
right to seek revenge.” Seeking justice involves working through the
legal system; seeking revenge could take many forms and be limitless in extent
and in time. Devoting oneself to
seeking revenge also, paradoxically, continues to place oneself in the power of
the person who has harmed you.
Forgiveness is profoundly liberating for the person doing the forgiving even if the person forgiven does not even
know about the forgiveness.
Forgiveness also can mean that the person doing the
forgiving is open to starting anew, to having a fresh relationship with the
perpetrator OR people like the perpetrator. The alternative is to forever brand anyone
resembling someone who has harmed us as people we cannot have a relationship
with, being unforgiving to an entire
large group of people to which the perpetrator happened to belong.
It sounds stupid
to do that, put that way, but it has happened that people have sought revenge
against people who in some non-behavioral
way resemble the person or people
who hurt them. Such an approach of “an
eye for an eye” would soon leave the whole world blind, as indeed it sometimes
seems we are.
Unforgiveness may sometimes have such a
grip on us that our first step towards forgiveness may merely be limiting our unforgiveness. I heard an
unforgettable example of that several years ago at the South Brunswick
Community Center, when our community hosted the Anne Frank exhibit. A survivor of the Nazi concentration camps
told us how he made a distinction between “the
Germans” as a nationality and “those
Germans” who had committed those atrocities.
If he can make
such a distinction, so can all of us.
So, if you have
been assaulted by a man or emotionally devastated by a woman, don’t take it out
on all men or all women, or lash out at all blacks or all whites, all Catholics
or all Protestants, and so on. Sounds
basic and it is, but such “vengeance,” right down to the tribal and familial
level, happens all the time. So the
first step to forgiveness is to limit our unforgiveness.
Next step? Well, to me, it’s like the old question of
“How do you eat an elephant?” Answer:
“One bite at a time.” If someone has
deeply wounded you, start by forgiving that person for something small, some
little “bite-sized piece” of their offense, if the whole matter seems
elephant-sized. Forgive even if the person does not apologize
and ask for your forgiveness.
The Rt. Rev.
Desmond Tutu, retired Anglican Archbishop of Southern Africa, says in his book No
Future Without Forgiveness, “If the victim could forgive only when the
culprit confessed, then the victim would be locked into the culprit’s whim,
locked into victimhood, whatever his own attitude or intention.”
Archbishop Tutu
gives the example of three ex-U.S. servicemen “standing in front of the Vietnam
Memorial in Washington, D.C. One asks,
‘Have you forgiven those who held you prisoner of war?’ ‘I will never forgive them,” replies the
other. His mate says, ‘Then it seems
they still have you in prison, don’t they?’”
“Forgiving,”
Archbishop Tutu declares, “means abandoning your right to pay back the
perpetrator in his own coin, but it is a loss that liberates the victim.”
Christ went to
his death speaking words of forgiveness which liberated him even as they spared those who crucified him divine retribution.
Do you want to be
free? Or do you want to be forever
angry, forever seeking vengeance, forever a victim, forever a slave to someone else’s bad behavior?
Limit
unforgiveness, forgive a bite-sized piece at a time, forgive for your own soul’s sake, and put your hurt in
perspective. This last point comes home
when reading Tutu’s book, which is based on his service as Chair of the Truth
and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa, which met after the fall of the
apartheid regime and offered amnesty to perpetrators of crimes against
humanity, whoever they were, if they
told the whole truth about what they had done, and proved it.
In some cases,
this meant former policemen leading the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to
the places where they had buried the bodies of people they had tortured and
murdered. Their families, who had only
known that their loved ones had disappeared, were at last able to receive the
bodies of their loved ones for burial, and after hearing the truth about their
last hours.
Hearing the truth,
including from some torture victims who had survived, was horrific. The stress on the commission members, and
even more on their translators (who spoke the very words of the victims) as
well as on the surviving victims, was enormous. But the process was cathartic, and truths were revealed that
never would have come to light any other way.
South Africa was
not a conquered nation, like Nazi Germany was, so the “victor’s justice” of the
Nuremberg Trials was not an option, but just “turning the page” was equally
unrealistic because no one had forgotten the atrocities of the apartheid era
and without some process, the desire
for vengeance would likely erupt like a volcano.
Amnesty was
granted, “for a limited time and definite period and purpose” and “only to
those who plead guilty, who accept responsibility for what they have
done.” The goal, Tutu says, was
“restorative justice.”
The result on the
“macro” level is that South Africa, for all its very real problems, had an
extraordinarily peaceful transition to a multi-racial democracy. Anyone who predicted a dozen years ago that
we would be saying that in 2005 might well have been taken to a psychiatrist. The result on the “micro” level is that some
people – not all, but some is miraculous enough – were able to forgive those
who abused or tortured them or members of their families. They gave up the right to seek revenge, and
even established some sort of a relationship with some former oppressors.
South Africa puts
things in perspective. Maybe
forgiveness is not impossible. Maybe
forgiveness is not impractical. Maybe
forgiveness is not “soft.” Maybe
forgiveness is in fact courageous, muscular, visionary, life-giving. Maybe, in fact, there is “no future without
forgiveness.”
May Christ’s
words from the cross help us to
forgive, and to accept his forgiveness of us.
The Rev. Francis A.
Hubbard
St. Barnabas Episcopal
Church
Monmouth Junction, New
Jersey