ISAIAH 49:1-7

PSALM 40:1-10

1 CORINTHIANS 1:1-9

JOHN 1:29-41

 

Sermon – 1/20/02

 

“What’s in it for me?”

 

    All too often, that’s a classic American question, to be asked of any proposed course of study, course of action, group activity or job.  “How will this benefit me, enable me to attain my objectives, help me to “get ahead” (however I define “getting ahead”).

 

    The use of the first person singular is significant.  In many other places and times, the question would have been (or still is), “What’s in it for us?”  “Us” was (or is) defined as the most meaningful group identity to the person, either in general or as it impacts the question being considered.

 

    “What’s in it for us?” could be asking, “What’s in it for the people of our family, community, state, nation, ethnic group, religion, age group, profession, union or a host of other identity groups.  I don’t see this kind of question as dominant in America today; instead “What’s in it for me?” dominates, as 280 million Americans are atomized into 280 million different interest groups, each with one member, each concerned with what he or she sees as his or her own unique interests.  This emphasis has been lessened in the last few months, but I think it’s too early to tell if we’ve seen a long-term shift.

 

    The question “What’s in it for me?” is asked about many things—including institutional religion.  And it’s a legitimate question.  After all, if the answer is “nothing”, why bother with institutional religion?  Why not just make up your own religion, or have a private, idiosyncratic relationship with God as you understand God without any spiritual community to urge you to grow in your understanding of who God is and what God wants you to do.

 

    So, when people come to church-goers and ask, explicitly or implicitly, “What would be in it for me if I came to your church?” it would be reasonable to answer the question, perhaps mentioning things like spiritual growth, a caring community, opportunities for learning and for serving others, inspiring worship, and a rector who cracks worse jokes than they do.

    HOWEVER, today’s Scriptures’ answer to the question “What’s in it for me?” would be to ignore that question—and answer instead another, more important question.

 

    Over 2,500 years ago, someone in the tiny community of Jews who were exiled in Babylon was having a bad day.  He was discouraged.  He was totally “bummed out”.  He was also the author of today’s first reading.  He called himself simply “The Servant of the Lord”, and despite his high and holy calling, he was really, really down.  He writes “I have labored in vain, I have spent my strength for nothing and vanity; yet surely my cause is with the LORD, and my reward is with my God.”

 

    He was waiting to hear from God “what was in it for him.”  He’s been faithful since birth, worked hard, done his best, gotten nowhere (or so he thought).  O.K.  So now, “What’s in it for me?”

 

    God responds “It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the survivors of Israel; I will give you as a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”  (emphasis added)

 

    “Oh good,” he might have said.  “Now what are my chances of doing that?”

 

    Guess what?  We here this morning are part of the proof that this commission by God worked.

 

    It’s fair to assume that all or nearly all of us come from countries which that particular individual 2,500 years ago didn’t know existed.  But he took that commission—to be a light to the nations, i.e., the Gentiles—and ran with it.  Over 500 years later, Jesus embodied the mission of the Servant of the LORD—and his followers did, over the centuries, take the Good News of God's love and offer of salvation to all people through Jesus Christ "to the ends of the earth”.  THAT’S how we, and our ancestors, first heard about Jesus Christ.  That wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

 

    Guess who God is counting on and commissioning to keep making this happen in our time and our place?  Look in the mirror each day for the answer.

 

    Twenty-five centuries ago the Servant of the LORD was wondering, “What’s in it for me?” and God answered with “what was in it for the world.”

 

    John the Baptist was standing with two of his own disciples when he saw Jesus.  John pointed to Jesus and said, “Behold the Lamb of God (who takes away the sin of the world).”

 

    John did not say to them, “Hey, guys, here’s the Man who can take away your sins.”  Andrew and the other disciple, to their credit, also did not say, “What’s in it for me?”  John had started by answering the real question, namely, “What’s in it for the world?”

 

    Without God’s action, sin would not merely be the world’s largest problem—rather, sin would conquer the world, totally and forever.  No hope, no end.  If you want a little vision of what that might look like, imagine the worst news of the last six months being repeated daily forever.

 

    Pointing out to them The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world got Andrew and the other disciple’s attention.  It should get our attention, too.  If the world can be saved, then so can we.

 

    The corollary of that is this:  if, as part of being saved, the world must be changedthen, so must we.

 

    In today’s Epistle, St. Paul writes to the members of the only church in Corinth, a “XXX-rated” seaport in which “Virgo’s” and the so-called “adult entertainment” section of Sayreville would have been comparatively wholesome influences.  Paul writes, “To the Church of God that is in Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, together with all those who in every place call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours:  Grace to you and peace from God our father and the Lord Jesus Christ."

 

    O.K., so in that kind of town the Christians were “called to be saints” and to be “sanctified”—made holy—and they were called to be “together” (at least spiritually and psychologically) with all Christians everywhere.  Phew!  That’s quite a package—wouldn’t one or the other be enough?

 

    Ah, but it’s not just “what’s in it for me” or even “what’s in it for ‘us’,” it’s what’s in it for the world.  If God’s plan for the world comes to fulfillment, you and I will be fine—if we participate in helping to fulfill the plan, both by growth in holiness and in togetherness with others far beyond our group.

 

    One Sunday here some years ago, somebody asked me why we include the Anglican Cycle of Prayer in the intercessions each week—why, specifically, we were praying for the church of Liberia, “way over there in Africa”?

 

    Well, I replied, because they’re part of our family, and people should remember members of their family in their prayers.  And it’s funny how things happen sometimes…because we found out after the service that the visitor who came to church that day was…the Suffragan Bishop of Liberia.  Visiting his sister, who lives in Kendall Park.  Hmm.

 

    We can grow both in holiness and togetherness with others by adopting a very expansive answer to the questions, “Who is a member of our family?” and “Who deserves our utmost respect and care?”  There is really only one answer which will do:  everybody.  God’s plan of salvation is not just for me or for you or for you-and-me, but for the world, and we can participate in it insofar as we participate in his wish that we grow both in holiness and connectedness to the whole human race.  And one way we can do both at the same time is to examine and root out from ourselves and from those we influence any and all taint of racism and prejudice.

 

    “Racial profiling” has gotten a lot of attention lately, as it should, and the attention has been focused on police in New Jersey and on federal law enforcement officers, both of which need to learn that it is both wrong to label someone as suspicious due to their race or ethnicity (as opposed to their behavior), and it lessens the chance of crime prevention, in two ways.

 

    First, I have yet to hear of any racial or ethnic “profile” which helped the authorities to catch Timothy McVeigh, Charles Manson, the Unibomber and a host of other appalling criminals before they committed murder, because they weren’t profiled.  Somehow, American-born whites just don’t seem to get profiled.

 

    Second, crime prevention is aided greatly if the authorities have the justifiable confidence of all the races and ethnic groups in the area they serve.  For example, 99.9% of all the “Middle-Eastern-looking people” who are now or have been in this country are as good or bad as anyone else.  The other .1% scare the living daylights out of me.  It will be a lot easier to find that dangerous .1% if the great majority of “Middle-Eastern-looking people” believe the authorities are truly only after evil-doers instead of anybody who looks Middle-Eastern.

 

    But let’s be serious:  “profiling” is not just done by certain law enforcement people.  It’s done by lots of people in lots of walks of life and lots of situations.  And it has a long history in this country—back to the days when “Help Wanted” signs added “No Irish need apply”, back to the days 100 years ago when the St. Barnabas cemetery specified that no Italians could be buried there, back to the days when American citizens with German accents were looked at as suspiciously as Arab-Americans are today.

 

    And yes, profiling exists in the Christian Church.

 

    Churches, subtly—and sometimes not so subtly, ask of inquirers, “Are you ‘our’ kind of person?”  The profiling churches do may be about race, or ethnicity, or economic status, or educational level, age, marital status, gay or straight, or even about whether or not you already knew how to get there.  I just heard of a church which a prospective visitor called for directions and the person who answered the phone at the church couldn’t give them directions!  And the person was a staff member.  That church clearly has a “profile” of who they want:  only the people who are already there.

 

    But the Christian Church doesn’t get to profile.  Whose sin does Christ take away?  The world’s.  Who were the Corinthian Christians supposed to be “together” with?  All those who in every place call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.”  Who was the Servant of the LORD called to reach out to?  “…the nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”

 

    Guess what:  that’s our commission too.  The “profile” of who God wants invited to have a saving relationship with Jesus Christ is:  human beings.  That’s the task we’ve been given, and to build an inclusive community in which all of its members can be treated with love and respect, strengthened and guided to reach out to the world in the power of the Holy Spirit.

 

    Kind of reminds me of a speech I once heard, about someone having a dream.  Sisters and brothers, The dream is now.  The dream is here.  The dream is us.  Be the dream.  Live the dream.  Make it come true, with God’s help.

(The Rev.) Francis A. Hubbard

St. Barnabas Episcopal Church